flybow : "60 minutes" has been running cover for AmeriKKKan imperialism, for decades.
Alien : You're welcome, hon.
Alien : David Hewlett (Dr. Rodney McKay from Stargate: Atlantis) stars in this.
yellow_rose1 : oh okay that makes sense to me now. It isn't the kind of viewing I'd be interested in, I d...
BluRain : Contains spoilers. Click to show. In the first episode, around 20 min mark, Barclay says he met The Doctor once. In the towe...
greenguy86 : It won't happen buddy. Learn history and you shall see that humans are destructive. Why do...
Blargenheimer : "Every crook and nanny" lol, I'm definitely going to use that in the future.
Sally : Thanks yellow rose .....your awesome
etim : There's a big stink about how CBS bigwigs got their segment pulled on the 'deportees' from...
Do you really expect people to read all that? Maybe next time write it out somewhere else, fix all the mistakes and redundancies, halve it and then copy and paste it here. Sadly the “voice of clear reason” is completely incoherent. All the young Gen Zs I know are hardcore left, as in really left-wing not the nonsensical US (mis-)understanding of the term. But then there is the minority that is extreme right, which sadly seems to be growing across the entire so-called western world. Hard to keep up the pretence of being the “goodies” with 24/7 surveillance and everything put online for all to see.
Weird. I don’t tend to presume limitations of large groups of “people” or the reader as you say. I don’t presume an unwillingness or perhaps aversions to reading. Perhaps incapabilities to speed read or consume textual information at above average levels.
I know the world is made up of all sorts of people with limitless unique qualities.
I generally allow others to decide or announce their personal choices limitations or traits for themselves.
Meanwhile your goal is to shame lengthy clear writing on the premise its too long.
You then branded me with your label the voice of reason because i was so reasonable and explanaied the reason in detail. Which you brand as unreasonably long to expect reasonable people to have the freedom to read.
Then you suggest its entirely inappropriate to even post at all here or if so to do so differently.
Isn’t that interesting?
So after electing to not engage or say too long didn’t read fake news then denying the assumed authority label you placed upon me and i at no time placed upon myself of voice of reason.
Then you go to tell us about the clear good and evil of the two sides and other odd arguements.
At some point i stopped trying to folow the unreason and gleeful detractions of someone who couldn’t even attack or reply to the actual substance of my statements on any level.
Only to attack the action in every other tangential way.
No meaningful on topic discourse of the film or my comment as it relates to the film but on your feelings about my comment as it relates to my validity and your ideas about political beliefs.
For all to see.